How engagements are priced — a framework
Pricing
We don't publish an off-the-shelf price list. The cost of automation isn't one line of model — it's the whole of server, logic, guardrails and LLM, plus the data and the volume you run. Instead, we're transparent about the axes that move the price.
ENGAGEMENT BANDS
01
A short, fixed-scope band that takes your single riskiest workflow and actually proves it can run unattended. Fixed scope, fixed timeline.
02
We scale the proven line into a real operating system — building the whole of server, logic, guardrails and LLM, and handing it over as a custom SaaS the client owns.
COST DRIVERS
Two jobs both called "automation" can price very differently along the axes below. We map them with you up front.
SAAS vs FOUNDRY
Use a finished product right away. Predictable, usage-based cost; start in the browser with no build. The fast path when a standard workflow fits.
We build a dedicated line inside your team. Project-based cost — proven first by PoC, then scaled in a full build. The deliverable is a system the client owns.
FAQ
There's no off-the-shelf price list. Cost is set not by the model but by scope, data, volume, deployment model, guardrail depth and operations scope. We prove your single riskiest workflow with a fixed-scope PoC (2–4 weeks), then price the full build (3–6 months) on the same basis.
A PoC is a 2–4 week, fixed-scope band that actually proves one workflow can run unattended. A full build is a 3–6 month build band that scales the proven line across server, logic, guardrails and LLM, handed over as a custom SaaS the client owns.
On-prem requires in-house hardware and isolated inference, so its up-front unit cost runs higher than cloud — but data and model inference never leave the building. Private cloud starts faster and scales on usage. You choose based on your sensitivity and regulatory requirements.
NEXT STEP
Tell us the workflows, the data and the deployment model you're thinking about, and we'll map the band and the cost drivers with you.